Cognitive Transcendence

Cognitive Transcendence

Sanaz Adibian
Copyright: © 2025 |Pages: 19
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-7366-5.ch005
Chapter PDF Download
Open access chapters are freely available for download

Abstract

Humans create according to their self-beliefs; thus, technological creations are self-realized. There is a discrepancy in understanding this relationship in the current research. The concept of the self has facilitated many exciting ideas that make it more complicated to understand. Many established psychological theories help a patient cope with the ailment rather than alleviate it. The article creates a brigade between cognitive psychology of the self and information technology. It shows a path to simplify the understanding of the self through the perspective of psychology, technology, and linguistics. The theory of cognitive transcendence explains that people do not suffer events; they suffer what they think about the events, and through the expansion of understanding, a person can cognitively transcend. Also, a novel perspective on the genesis of the self and a formula to calculate self-esteem is conceptualized. The final derivative is to create a pathway for the mental freedom of the self and how technology can be used to further understand the self and vice versa.
Chapter Preview
Top

Technically Technical

The inequality between technology and human creativity was introduced in the 1950s by the Austrian philosopher Günther Anders (Fuchs, 2017, Chimirri & Schraube, 2019). He proposed there is a rebellious or “Prometheus” breach between “the relations of production and ideology, production and imagination, doing and feeling, knowledge and conscience, the machine and the body, production and needs” (Anders, 1956, as cited in, Fuchs, 2017, p. 3). He proposed that if these dualities do not conjoin, then the maleficence of technology will be far greater than its benevolence (Fuchs, 2017; Schraube, 2005). Since then, investigators and scientists have been attempting to bind the gap between information technology and understanding (Sandra, 2022). However, some researchers realize that self-understanding may be the key to mend this gap (Fuchs, 2017; Kool & Agrawal, 2016).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset