EmBRACE the Transition: Reflections From Three Deaf Education Faculty

EmBRACE the Transition: Reflections From Three Deaf Education Faculty

Jennifer Renée Kilpatrick, Stephanie J. Gardiner-Walsh, Jessica A. Scott
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-3460-4.ch008
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In this chapter, readers will meet three junior faculty in the niche field of deaf education who teach in different programs in different states. As doctoral students, they met at a field-specific conference about a decade before they wrote this chapter. Throughout the last 10 years, they have developed relationships as colleagues, friends, and now, co-authors. They share their experiences, both as individuals and as a collective, through the use of narrative storytelling and collaborative reflection. The authors reflect on and synthesize their stories with a focus on (1) the impacts of the K-12 experience on their transitions into higher education, (2) the role of the conference/organization during these transitions, and (3) the barriers and supports they encountered throughout the transitions. The chapter concludes with their advice to readers on how to emBRACE the transition from K-12 to higher education, using BRACE as an acronym for five proactive steps individuals can take to ensure a successful transition.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

The transition to higher education can be lonely and challenging for many academics. For those coming from the K-12 or PK-12 systems, the passion of teaching meets a significant challenge in balancing the additional priority demands of scholarship and service in a system that often does not clearly articulate the expectations and demands of each facet of work with transparency. Researchers have long noted issues with the process of tenure in higher education (McPherson & Schapiro, 1999), particularly among minority or minoritized faculty (Abdul-Raheem, 2016). The pressures of tenure and promotion can be exceedingly difficult if you feel alone and under-prepared.

This chapter is a reflective narrative compilation written by three junior faculty. In our stories, we share our journeys from K-12 to higher education and provide insight in how to brace yourself for the transition to higher education. While we are each currently pursuing tenure and promotion at different universities, our paths and stories are linked as faculty in the common field of deaf education. We share our stories together as an acknowledgment that we have not faced our transitions alone. Because deaf education is a niche field, which most readers are not likely to be familiar with, we begin with an introduction of our field, to provide a contextual foundation for our stories. Additionally, we have included definitions for many of the common terms in our field at the conclusion of the chapter.

Sensory disability fields (i.e., blind, deaf, deafblind) are small and isolated due to the extreme low incidence of these disabilities. According to the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Special Education Programs most recent report to Congress, in 2018, there were 6,315,228 students ages 6-21 who were served under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, 2004). This accounts for 9.5% of school-aged children in the U.S. However, less than 70,000 deaf or hard of hearing (d/hh) students were served, meaning d/hh students account for approximately 1.1% of students with disabilities and less than .01% of the total school-aged population. Because there is a low-incidence of deafness in schools, only a very small percentage of teachers are prepared to provide instruction for this unique population. The number of total deaf education teacher preparation programs in the U.S. is also small and continuously decreasing, with fewer than 60 programs currently preparing teachers of the deaf (Jones & Ewing, 2002; Dolman, 2010; Paul, 2021).

Most of these deaf education programs have one to two full time faculty and employ adjuncts to teach much of the curriculum. Additionally, the programs and faculty are often placed in departments with adjacent fields such as communication sciences and disorders, ASL/English interpreting, or special education. This leaves higher education deaf education faculty isolated without support, as there is no widespread understanding of deaf education even within the field of special education (Alexander, 1992). Gardiner-Walsh and colleagues (2021) have noted difficulty among those in sensory disability fields to find work/life balance and research partners.

Although the field is small and spread out, it is also well connected despite geographical separation and isolation. The authors began their undergraduate and graduate journeys at roughly the same time and initially became acquainted at American College Educators - Deaf and Hard of Hearing (ACEDHH), a professional conference that we first attended as doctoral students, almost ten years ago. We have since developed our relationships as both colleagues and friends as we have completed our doctoral studies and each traveled similar paths to tenure track positions at research intensive institutions. Throughout the pursuit of promotion and tenure, our friendship has strengthened as we have supported one another through both similar and dissimilar experiences. In this chapter, we tell our stories, both as individuals and a group through the use of narrative storytelling and collaborative reflection.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Deaf: This term is used to refer to individuals with hearing loss of any level.

Signed Exact English: A system of signs used to represent English; while many of the base signs are borrowed from ASL, the system itself is designed to code English through additional symbolism of English grammar.

FM System: An assistive listening technology that provides additional amplification. Technology may include sound fields of speakers, bluetooth to personal hearing aids or cochlear implants, loop systems, or a combination of each. Additional information can be found through the National Deaf Center’s FM Systems 101.

American Sign Language: The natural sign language of deaf people in the United States and Canada, among other places; this language has its own unique parameters of language including syntax, semantics, pragmatics, morphology, and phonology.

Rochester Method: A manual coding system which uses the 26 letters of the manual alphabet to express all communication; while the method has long since gone by the wayside, many members of the Deaf community have been exposed or required to use this as a communication method.

Audism: Discrimination based on the perception that auditory (spoken and listening) communication is superior ( Eckert & Rowley 2013 ; Humphries, 1977 ).

DeafDisabled: This term is used to refer to individuals with hearing loss and an additional disability (e.g. a deaf person with an intellectual disability); in other contexts, it may be defined as Deaf with Disability, Deaf with {diagnosis}, etc.

Cued Speech: A system of handshapes and placements that supports the phonetic coding of a spoken language; each handshape represents the consonants of the spoken language and the placements represent the vowels.

Ableism: Oppression of disabled persons in direct or indirect behaviors and practices that limit full participation in society.

Deafblind: This term is used refer to individuals with hearing and vision loss of any levels.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset