Pedagogical Sustainability of Interoperable Formal and Informal Learning Environments

Pedagogical Sustainability of Interoperable Formal and Informal Learning Environments

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-783-8.ch722
(Individual Chapters)
No Current Special Offers

Chapter Preview



The revolution that new technologies have brought about in every field is urging a new vision: knowledge and knowledge management, teaching and learning, social relations and the individual need to be reconsidered in the light of the current importance of interaction and networks. The knowledge society requires new roles and skills, and a new awareness as “active citizens” (Demetrio, 2002; Leone, 2009). Learning to learn has turned out to be a key skill to actively participate in society along life. Formal, non-formal and informal learning have become key words of this age; in particular, there is an increasing understanding that learning occurs for the most part outside the traditional formal situations.

Few years ago knowledge was a matter of categorization and hierarchies; today it is represented through networks and “ecologies” (Morin, 2008), it is diffused and distributed. As a whole, life is both a learning and a knowledge-based process.

Knowledge, people, and technology nodes represent useful resources. In this view, human mind, too, is a network, an ecology. It adapts to the environment and, accordingly, learning has become chaotic, continual, co-created and complex. Learning is an integrated process where changes with one element alter the entire ecology of the network. As a result, knowledge is subject to complex and adaptive systems (Siemens, 2006).

In this scenario, the changing role of education systems into networked organizations, into “ecologies”, is decisive in order to support learners in constructing various personal learning networks to deeply understand complex fields (Fini, 2008; Sclater, 2008).

Over next years, teaching and learning will go through essential changes. Massive use of new technologies and the revolution of Web 2.0 social tools are only two of the elements that have deeply influenced learning approaches, for three main reasons:

  • 1.

    many web services are free and easy to use by a connection to the Internet;

  • 2.

    people may access nodes of information and create knowledge;

  • 3.

    learners are becoming technically proficient, networked, multi-tasking and lifelong learners (Seely-Brown, 2009; Siemens & Tittenberger, 2009).

The effectiveness of Web 2.0 educational tools depends on the pedagogical sustainability beneath and on internationally shared standards to facilitate interoperability.

In this regard, over recent years research literature has underlined a need for a new theoretical interpretation of teaching and learning methods in education (Catarsi, 2007; Conole, 2008a; Marconato, 2003) to support the new educational models that are being introduced in the light of the lifelong learning paradigm. Emphasis on the shift from formal to informal e-learning through knowledge management and sharing (Leone, 2009; Sclater, 2008; Trentin, 2005) has been placed, with particular attention to Personal Learning Environments (PLE) as learner-centred spaces.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: