Sociological Perspectives on Improving Medical Diagnosis Emphasizing CAD

Sociological Perspectives on Improving Medical Diagnosis Emphasizing CAD

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch088
(Individual Chapters)
No Current Special Offers


Health care costs worldwide are increasing because of new medicines, new techniques, and more expensive and extensive research on diseases. It is essential that health care delivery systems be implemented which take advantage of these advances in a cost effective economic manner. One critical aspect of the health care delivery system is the improvement in diagnosis of disease. This paper emphasizes diagnosis and the need to collect key patient information “pivotal information” at the earliest possible point in the patient's disease process, and put such pivotal information in physicians' hands. There is a potential for huge benefits in cost savings and greater effectiveness of treatment from these actions, but challenges must be overcome to realize their full benefits. The major problems include (1) market incentives in the current health care system which fails to encourage collecting pivotal medical information as early as possible (2) physician resistance to some of these ideas and (3) technical and ethical problems that remain to be solved.
Chapter Preview

The Process Of Diagnosis

Diagnosis is sociologically a process of bounded rationality, consisting of evidence gathering punctuated by a series of conjectures about a patient’s ills before arriving at the best conjecture and treatment plan. This view of diagnostics originates from Zeldenrust's (1990) version of the garbage can model of organizational behavior that sees diagnosis as a linkage between a demand (patient with an illness) and a solution (physician guesses nature of underlying problem and offers a plan for treatment). The solution may include medicine, behavioral modification such as bed rest, change in diet etc., and perhaps tests to rule out certain competing diagnostic hypotheses consistent with applicable constraints. The physician builds on the information learned not only from the patient reports but also on test results and on other objective data obtained. The physician treats symptoms uncovered until the patient either is cured and a final diagnosis is achieved or at least until all competing hypotheses about the condition are ruled out.

Improving the diagnostic process hinges on rapidly expanding the diagnostic information available to the physician. This diagnostic information is not just any data but the sort that expands the number of hypotheses of possible diagnoses, i.e. pivotal data. The physician can then examine the maximum number of plausible hypotheses. The idea is that the more hypotheses the physician needs to rule out at the outset the more likely the physician will find the disease(s) behind the patient’s complaint and provide the proper treatment (including referral for specialized services). The process also covers multiple possible pathologies that may exist at any moment, although the clinician may place ordering priorities on these possible multiple pathologies.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Diagnostic Process: The process of arriving at a diagnosis using various informational inputs from a patient's inquiry, symptoms or complaints.

Diagnosis: A conclusion or assumption the pathology represented by a patient's inquiry, particular set of symptoms, or complaints.

Computer Assisted Diagnosis (CAD): A conclusion as to the disease reached with the assistance of a computer.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: