Business Cost Budgets: A Methodology to Incorporate Business Impact into Service Level Agreements

Business Cost Budgets: A Methodology to Incorporate Business Impact into Service Level Agreements

Axel Kieninger (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany), Gerhard Satzger (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany), Detlef Straeten (IBM Deutschland GmbH, Germany), Björn Schmitz (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany) and Dian Baltadzhiev (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany)
DOI: 10.4018/jssmet.2012070104
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


In this work the authors address an IT service customer’s challenge of selecting the cost-optimal service level agreement among different options offered by an external provider. They model the customer’s optimization problem at distinctive levels of detail with regard to the description of service quality aspects. At each level of detail they explicitly consider the potential negative monetary impact of different service quality levels on a customer’s business process – reflected via the concept of “business cost.” First, they analyze which information a customer typically bases service level agreement decisions upon today and elaborate on the question which additional information a rational customer would need to take a well-founded decision. Second, the authors define a set of concepts that a customer should consider when selecting service level agreements. Third, the authors apply these concepts to develop a “business cost budget method” that enables a customer to compare multiple service level agreements and to select the cost-optimal solution of its optimization problem – assuming customer and provider to collaborate. Introducing this approach, they suggest that both parties jointly define “business cost budgets” as an additional kind of service indicator describing service quality’s adverse business impact instead of only service quality.
Article Preview

2. Literature Review

The following literature review was conducted following the methodology proposed by Webster and Watson (2002). In an extensive forward and backward search without temporal restriction, Google Scholar and CiteSeer served as the main sources of search. Keywords used were, among others, “service level objective,” “service level agreement,” “service level management,” “optimal choice,” “business impact,” “incident management,” “decision theory,” and “customer.”

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Volume 13: 6 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 4 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing