Computer-Assisted Instruction: A Case Study of Two Charter Schools

Computer-Assisted Instruction: A Case Study of Two Charter Schools

Jared Keengwe (Department of Teaching and Learning, University of North Dakota, Grandforks, ND, USA) and Farhan Hussein (Lighthouse Academy of Nations, Minneapolis, MN, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/jicte.2013010107
OnDemand PDF Download:
$37.50

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship in achievement gap between English language learners (ELLs) utilizing computer-assisted instruction (CAI) in the classroom, and ELLs relying solely on traditional classroom instruction. The study findings showed that students using CAI to supplement traditional lectures performed better than the students relying solely on traditional classroom instruction. In addition, using CAI to supplement traditional lectures helped the charter schools to close the educational achievement gap of their students. Based on the findings, there is need for teachers to move past traditional learning, and learn new technology skills in order to incorporate sound technology-enhanced instructional strategies to support student learning.
Article Preview

Introduction

English-language learners (ELL) consist of the fastest growing percentage of the overall student body (National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Education Programs (NCLEA, 2007). In 1979 to 2003, the ELL students increased by 124%, while other student populations increased by 19% (National Center for Education Statistics, 2004). It is also likely that the percentage of ELL students in American public schools will continue to grow. Additionally, ELL students are spread all over other several states in the nation (Capps, Fix, Murray, Ost, Passel, & Herwantoro, 2005; Flynn & Hill, 2005). About 8 out of 10 ELL students speak Spanish, but some districts have students who represent more than 100 different language groups (National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Education Programs (NCLEA, 2007).

While computer-assisted instruction (CAI) has provided a supplemental instructional method in schools for almost two decades, there is still debate on the importance of delivery systems and instructional methods. CAI generally refers to drill-and-practice, tutorials, simulation/interactive thinking, word processing, conferencing, and other activities (Fletcher-Flinn & Gravatt, 1995). Specifically, CAI consists of drill and practice, simulation tasks, instructional games, and tutorials; instruction can contain new material, and can be used alone or as an enhancement to traditional instructional methods (Bitter & Pierson, 1999; Cotton, 2001).

Computer use in the classrooms has boomed since the 1980s, fueling a debate over whether or not computer-assisted instruction (CAI) is an effective means of improving student achievement. CAI is one of the six best practices, which support literacy learning at the elementary school level (Drake, 2001). Proponents of CAI argue that there is a positive learning advantage for computer-assisted instruction when compared with traditional instruction (Fletcher-Flinn & Gravatt, 1995). Additionally, computer technology makes learning easier, more efficient, and more motivating (Schacter & Fagnano, 1999). There are many reasons that educators should put computer technology in ELL environment: a) It gives a practice time, b) It motivates students, c) It enhance student learning, d) It increase authentic materials that students can study, and e) It encourage team work between students (Lee, 2000).

In a meta-analysis of 500 studies, Kulik (1994) reported that CAI increased the positive attitudes of students toward learning, which resulted in increased learning. Similar to the findings of Niemiec and Walberg (1987), Kulik’s findings suggest that CAI is more effective in improving achievement of younger students and students with special learning needs. Students of lower socio-economic status benefit more from CAI than do students who are from a more advantaged environment (Cotton, 2001). The findings from a comparison study in motivation of elementary and intermediate level second-language students learning English through print revealed that CAI increases motivation for learning English in students whose primary language is not English (Garcia & Arias, 2000). Other findings suggest that students learning increased up to 40% faster through CAI instruction as this mode increases student time on task (Cotton, 2001). Further, CAI boosts positive attitudes of students toward learning.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing