Mobile Phone Use and Stress-Coping Strategies of Medical Students

Mobile Phone Use and Stress-Coping Strategies of Medical Students

Masahiro Toda, Satoko Ezoe, Tatsuya Takeshita
DOI: 10.4018/ijcbpl.2014100104
(Individual Articles)
No Current Special Offers


This paper investigates associations between mobile phone use and stress coping. To 139 medical university students, a set of self-reporting questionnaires designed to evaluate mobile-phone use and stress coping was administered. In relation to the intensity of mobile phone use, the low-dependence group had statistically significantly higher scores for coping strategy, planful problem solving, than the high-dependence group. When the respondents were allocated to one of three groups according to which mobile-phone service they use most frequently, scores for planful problem solving were statistically significantly higher in the voice phone group than in the Web-browsing group. These findings suggest that the intensity and type of mobile phone use may be associated with stress coping, particularly planful problem solving strategy.
Article Preview

2. Method

For 139 medical university students, we distributed a set of self-reporting questionnaires designed to evaluate mobile-phone use and stress coping. The students immediately filled out the forms, which were collected upon completion. Statistical analysis was possible for 127 respondents (44 males, 83 females), who properly completed all the questionnaire items. Mean (± SD) age for males was 19.3 ± 1.9 years and for females 18.7 ± 0.9 years. Before the study, the protocol received approval from the institutional review board and informed consent was obtained for each participant.

Mobile phone dependence was evaluated using the MPDQ (Toda, Monden, Kubo, & Morimoto, 2004, 2006), a self-rating questionnaire comprising 20 items. Each response was scored on a Likert scale (hardly ever, 0; sometimes, 1; often, 2; and always, 3), and scores for each item were then summed to provide an overall mobile phone dependence score ranging from 0 to 60, higher scores indicating greater dependence. Subjects in the highest quartile were classified as highly dependent. In addition, we also investigated the frequency of the use of voice phone, e-mail, and Web browsing services on mobile phones.

Stress coping was evaluated using the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCQ) (Folkman & Lazarus, 1988a), which consists of 64 items and includes eight subscales – planful problem solving, confrontive coping, seeking social support, accepting responsibility, self-controlling, escape–avoidance, distancing, and positive reappraisal. Using a Likert scale (not used, 0; used somewhat, 1; and used a great deal, 2), scores for each coping strategy ranged from 0 to 16, higher scores indicating more use of that particular coping strategy.

All results are displayed as mean values ± standard deviation. Student’s t test was used to compare WCQ scores between, and one-way ANOVA among, groups classified according to mobile phone use. Furthermore, gender differences in scores for the WCQ were analyzed using Student’s t test. Bonferroni’s test was used for multiple comparisons. Values were considered to be significantly different when p < 0.05.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2011)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing