Developing Student Self-Assessment Competences in the Online Learning Environment Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

Developing Student Self-Assessment Competences in the Online Learning Environment Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

Valentin Blândul, Adela Bradea
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8247-3.ch009
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$33.75
List Price: $37.50
10% Discount:-$3.75
TOTAL SAVINGS: $3.75

Abstract

Didactic self-assessment represents students' ability to make value judgments on their own academic performances obtained as a result of the instructive-educational process. Developing self-assessment competences in the virtual environment represents a major challenge, given that teachers' regulatory intervention to ensure the objectivity of the process is very limited. The aim of the present study conducted on a sample of 139 students from the University of Oradea, Romania was to identify how the implementation of an interactive teaching approach may contribute to the formation of student self-assessment competences as objectively as possible. The results obtained showed that most students tend to underestimate themselves in exams due to a lack of confidence in their own abilities due to insufficient preparation for the subjects studied. However, the use of specific strategies for the development of self-assessment competences can lead to their improvement but only if they are implemented constantly and to as many study subjects as possible.
Chapter Preview
Top

Background

In the last 3 decades, the instructive-educational process from Romania has undergone significant changes, one of the most important being the shift of emphasis from the teaching/assessment activity of the teacher to the learning/self-assessment of the student (Kiss, 2018). The literature addresses self-assessment from various points of view. In terms of social psychology, Breakwell (1992) relates self-assessment to social self-efficacy and defines it as the perception of each individual on their own abilities, which influences their course of action, cognitive patterns, motivational level or emotional reactions in various situations. The perception of one's own effectiveness is positive if the individual has succeeded in accomplishing the tasks and is negative if the individual has been wrong or unable to correctly anticipate future actions. The authors' observations have applicability in different areas of social life such as orientation towards various forms of schooling, choosing a career or involvement in political or social activities (Breakwell, 1992).

With reference to the educational phenomenon, self-assessment represents “the student's ability to make value judgments on his/her own academic competences and performances, of his/her own person, in general” (Stan, 2001, p.11). By analysing this definition, one can notice a number of similarities with Breakwell and his collaborators' conception. As in the case of the social dimension of this phenomenon, academic self-assessment aims at students' own cognitive, emotional and practical skills that will lead to academic performance as an expression of achieving a learning task. However, the two components are not always in a direct relationship, sometimes students may have high availability, but not materialized by performing a school task at optimal parameters. A reverse situation where students obtain outstanding performances in terms of reduced skills for that activity is also possible. In such situations, the role of self-assessment is precisely to seize the real level of their academic competences meant to facilitate the achievement of expected performance.

From a socio-psychological point of view, achieving self-assessment in students is strongly mediated by their personality traits, the requirements of their background as well as by teachers' teaching style. Without the intention to carry out a “factorial analysis” of these elements, it can be noted that students' age can influence the assessment of the difficulty of the task and of their own potential (elements that constitute the cognitive-estimation component) as well as the setting of the level of aspiration and immediate expectation (elements that form the affective-motivational component). The demands of the family, academic and social environment as well as the status students hold within can influence the way students perceive themselves or others. Also, teachers can encourage the formation of self-assessment competence in students through the teaching/assessment strategies that they use, the type of learning they cultivate and, in general, through their value as a teaching model and human personality (Bradea, 2012). On the other hand, a very close interdependence is established between self-assessment and self-knowledge, being absolutely necessary to know one's own potential, but also that of others in order to correctly estimate the chances of success and to objectively appreciate one's own achievements. In addition, accurate self-assessment can create the premises for self-knowledge/inter-knowledge as close as possible to the truth (Blândul, 2014).

Key Terms in this Chapter

Didactic Evaluation: A complex psycho-pedagogical act to establish the relevance and value of some works, achievements, behaviours, processes, etc. by relating them to a system of performance indicators, respectively pre-established criteria and standards.

University Curriculum: The comprehensive multitude of learning experiences offered by universities to students.

Self-Assessment: The process of assessing (through different evaluation techniques) one's own results.

Complementary Academic Assessment Strategies: Additional non-standardized assessment strategies/techniques for measuring objectives that are more difficult to quantify, with a deeply integrative character achieved through interdisciplinarity and multilateral training; offer various opportunities for students to demonstrate the level of theoretical and practical-applicative acquisitions.

Inter-Assessment: The process of assessing (through different evaluation techniques) colleagues' results.

Interactive Teaching Strategies: Set of resources, methods, forms of organization of the group of pupils/students that supports active learning, in which the learner acts on the information to transform it into new, personal information.

Objectivity in the Didactic Evaluation: Feature of the evaluation according to which evaluation is not influenced and does not bear the mark of the one who makes it.

Academic Performance: Students' level of theoretical and practical training which is measured by estimating the acquisition ratio and the provisions of the university curricula.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset