Literacy Teacher Preparation for Educational Justice Through Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies

Literacy Teacher Preparation for Educational Justice Through Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies

Jane M. Saunders, Minda Morren Lopez
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-5098-4.ch003
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors describe their positions as social justice educators and provide concrete examples for engaging educators in reflection, discussion, and praxis in a required course for preservice teachers in literacy. They describe concrete steps they have taken to incorporate and model a culturally rich pedagogical practice. They both believe that a course that requires reading, writing, and thinking provides a rich backdrop for engaging with preservice teachers about cultural and linguistic diversity and for moving into spaces of working towards equity and justice in society by engaging in action. Given that they each require students to apply what they are learning in the creation of learning centers and final projects, the authors believe their models of practice and praxis along with conversations about the necessity of a social justice stance will manifest in quality work as students design reading and writing assignments of their own.
Chapter Preview
Top

Background

Defining Social Justice Education

For us, social justice education requires a recognition that society is stratified in many significant ways, including along lines of race, language background and proficiency, class, gender, sexuality, and ability. This stratification is built into the sociohistorical and structural fabric of our schools and institutions and impacts people on both structural and individual levels (Sensoy & DiAngelo, 2017). As social justice educators, we must recognize these power relations and understand our role in systems that can lift up some members while marginalizing others (Carlisle, Jackson & George, 2006). Perhaps equally important, we seek opportunities to take action (Grant & Sleeter, 2010). That means aiding in the identification and examination of instances of injustice so our students – who will soon follow us into the classroom – can grapple with issues of injustice that they might otherwise overlook in their daily lives.

In acknowledgement that we fit the dominant demographic of teacher today: white, middle class women, we believe it is necessary to examine the role we play in the overall system. We understand that our voices have power, and it is necessary to not just how we think of how we fit, but how others may perceive us. As social justice educators, we constantly reflect and analyze our own thinking, actions, and ideologies and in turn we teach our students to think critically about our singular and collective knowledge bases, beliefs, and ideologies and how we have come to know and understand concepts, as well as whose knowledge(s) we are privileging in our curricula, pedagogies, and understandings. As we learn more and reflect on these concepts, we are also driven to action, to praxis, and we understand the importance of engaging constantly in this cycle of learning, reflecting, doing (Hackman, 2005). Because for us, the point of being a social justice educator is to create a more just society.

This is where our practices come in. We believe that in order to achieve a more just educational system, we must reframe issues of access and equity for students of color (Paris & Alim, 2014) on two fronts: we must foster linguistic and cultural flexibility for students of color as well as white students; and, we must re-center the aim of education to multilingualism and multiculturalism. Promoting these aspirations is increasingly important to meet the demographic imperative (Hodgkinson, 2002) of the educational landscape across our state and the nation: there are increasing numbers of culturally and linguistically diverse students represented in public school classrooms, students who deserve to be seen, supported, and cared for by the predominantly white teachers who work as educators today.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Touchstone Texts: A text with compelling attributes such as themes, characters, mechanics or organization that can be used as an example to teach about a particular content or aspect of writing.

Self-Study: A research method for systematically studying your own practice, teaching, or other phenomenon.

Equity: Fair and equitable treatment of all members of society, regardless of how groups or individuals are defined.

Critical Media Literacy: Readers interrogate text to examine and challenge the dominant power structures.

Preservice Teachers: Students who are studying to become teachers.

Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy: A pedagogical practice that supports multilingualism and multiculturalism in practice and perspective for both students and teachers.

Anti-Bias Framework: A set of anchor standards and age-appropriate learning outcomes divided into four domains—identity, diversity, justice, and action.

Praxis: Action that results from reflection.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset