The Adoption and Development of Airbnb Services in Norway: A Regional Perspective

The Adoption and Development of Airbnb Services in Norway: A Regional Perspective

Abbas Strommen-Bakhtiar, Evgueni Vinogradov
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2469-5.ch003
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Collaborative consumption facilitated by peer-to-peer platforms has witnessed a rapid expansion in the areas of hospitality and tourism. However, it is very unevenly distributed across countries, regions, cities and neighborhoods. The aim of this article is to investigate why collaborative consumption takes off early and continues flourishing in some regions, while remaining almost non-existent in other regions. The extant literature provides some insights into the effect of demand-side factors on sharing economy. However, this literature largely neglects the role of supply. Informed by the innovation adaption literature, the present study seeks to address this gap. The analysis reveals that regions with a) well-developed tourism industry, b) relatively large number of available properties, and c) situated near the main tourist attractions, tend to have relatively large supply of Airbnb listings and relatively many Airbnb tourists. An early adoption of Airbnb services is also associated with availability of properties to rent out.
Chapter Preview
Top

2. Literature Review

Since its inception in 2008, Airbnb has shown a great ability to grow not only nationally but also internationally. This tremendous growth has caused concerns in national governments about taxation and regulations; local governments about the availability of affordable rental accommodations for the local population; and the hotel industry which sees a major threat to its very existence.

National governments primarily see the expansion of the platform-based rental companies such as Airbnb, HomeAway, etc., as a national regulation and taxation problem. To this end they have relied primarily on the existing laws. For example, in Norway, the government has not changed any of its tax laws, and it is not likely to do radical changes in the short run (Norges Finansdepartementet, 2017).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset