The History of Incarceration of African Americans/Blacks in the United States

The History of Incarceration of African Americans/Blacks in the United States

Valandra, Tremaine Leslie
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-9209-0.ch002
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The control, regulation, and policing of African American/Black people is a persistent feature of the history of White supremacist legislation, policies, and practices leading the construction of the era of mass incarceration. The mass incarceration of African American/Black families living in poverty in the United States has had a devastating impact on the lives of families and communities. The goal of this chapter is to examine the historical and contemporary legislative and policing practices resulting in the mass incarceration of African American/Black families. The authors also identify trends in incarceration rates to demonstrate the staggering reality that a significant portion of the African American/Black population in the United States lives locked up behind bars in federal and state prisons, or community supervisory conditions including probation and parole. The authors conclude by offering recommendations to minimize the incarceration of African Americans/Blacks and resources for clinicians to better support the community.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

The goal of this chapter is to chronicle the legacy of the disproportionate representation of African Americans/Blacks in the criminal justice system in the United States. The terms African American and Black are used interchangeably to define the ethnicity of individuals with ancestral origins in Africa and direct family lineage in North America to the transatlantic slave trade or any person who self-identifies ethnically as African American and/or Black. The authors use the multi-systems life course (MSLC) (Murphy-Erby et al., 2010) perspective to examine the socio-historical, economic, and political contexts of African American incarceration beginning with the institution of Black enslavement and its evolution into modern-day mass incarceration. The Afrocentric Intergenerational Solidarity (AIS) (Waites, 2008, 2009) framework is used by the authors to contextualize African American family responses to incarceration through a lens of traditional African American generational cultural values. The authors chronicle the path of policing and social control of Black bodies through legislative policies and social practices by majority-White policymakers and organizations and reinforced with attention to interlocking educational, child welfare, and social systems. It is important to acknowledge that White supremacist ideology and values can be internalized and perpetuated by individuals in positions of power from any racial/ethnic background. The internalization of racism by people of color can be equally injurious to the lives of African American families (Speight, 2007).

The persistent systematic structure of policing and social control of Black people has led many scholars, civic leaders, and activists to argue that the enslavement of Black people in the United States did not end with the Emancipation Proclamation of 1865, but instead, evolved into a system of mass incarceration (Alexander, 2010; Stevenson, 2014). Including both the adult and juvenile criminal justice systems in which Black men, women, and children are disproportionately overrepresented, the authors document the historical evolution of policing policies and practices from slavery and the slave codes through Reconstruction, Jim Crow segregation, the Black migration from the south, and the industrial revolution. The authors examine the historical origins of contemporary methods of controlling Black bodies including incarceration, community supervision, probation, and parole with particular attention to the intersections of race, gender, class, and age in understanding the types of offenses African Americans are typically charged with and convicted of, and the sentencing practices and decision-making mechanisms that drive policies and practices within the adult, juvenile, child welfare, and school systems. The authors identify legislation and practices resulting in the disproportionate sentencing of Black children as adults and their confinement in adult prison systems and the role of child welfare as a pipeline to the juvenile justice system. Additionally, the authors demonstrate how overwhelmingly White public-school administrators, teachers, and decision-makers use harsh “Zero Tolerance” school policies and practices to routinely push Black children out of school and into the prison pipeline. Implications for policy, practice, and advocacy are discussed. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a tool to engage counselors in culturally responsive policy and practice and resources to reduce the risk factors that contribute to African American family incarceration. While African American families from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds experience incarceration, the chapter focuses primarily on the experiences of Black families living in poverty.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Structural Racism: The systemic ways policies and practices are developed, maintained, and perpetuated differentially to privilege and advance some groups favorably and disadvantage and disenfranchise other groups.

Implicit Racial Bias: unintentional or unconscious prejudice toward someone based on their skin color, racial, or ethnic origin.

Disproportionality: The overrepresentation or underrepresentation of a group relative to its representation in the total population.

Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC): The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) requires states to identify and address DMC at multiple decision points in processing juvenile cases, not just at the point of confinement.

White Supremacy: The ideological belief in the inherent superiority of people categorized as White and the inherent inferiority of racial, ethnic groups categorized as nonwhite.

Disparity: The unequal distribution of and accessibility to resources across different groups.

Anti-Racism: The active process of recognizing, acknowledging, and challenging white supremacist ideology by changing beliefs, policies, and practices to redistribute power and resources in racially equitable ways.

Adultification: The perception that Black children are older, adult-like, less innocent, and more culpable than their White peers when they exhibit the same developmentally appropriate behaviors.

Racial Microaggressions: Intentional and unintentional everyday verbal, behavioral, or environmental humiliations that communicate negative racial slights, insults, assaults, invalidations of people categorized as nonwhite.

Matrix of Domination: A sociological paradigm coined by Dr. Patricia Hill-Collins to locate and explain lived experiences with interlocking forms of oppression based on various classification of identity (race, class, age, sexual orientation, gender, etc.) within the social contexts that produce them.

Relative Rate Index (RRI): A tool designed to identify and measure disparities across the stages of processing cases in the juvenile justice system by comparing rates of juvenile justice contact experienced by different youth groups.

Racial Stress or Trauma: The negative effects of race-related distress. Symptoms may include anxiety, depression, anger, fear, sadness, helplessness, shame, hypervigilance, isolation, avoidance, etc.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset