Digital Transformation: The Impetus Behind the Initiative

Digital Transformation: The Impetus Behind the Initiative

Serena K. Roberts (Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, USA), Deidre P. Williams (Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, USA) and Genyne H. Boston (Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-9331-7.ch002
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


This chapter provides context for the following chapters. It describes the process used to launch the inaugural cohort of the Provost's Digital Learning Initiative. It describes the impetus for the initiative; details of the way it was crafted, including topics in the workshop series; and the envisioned future of this ongoing project. In addition to the works referenced within the chapter, other resources used with the first cohort are included. The chapters that follow detail cohort members' experiences and results.
Chapter Preview

Envisioning The Initiative

Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (FAMU) is a public, historically black university and currently ranks as the fifth largest HBCU with an estimated enrollment of 9,713 students. It is a member of the State University System of Florida, offers 56 bachelor’s degrees, 29 master’s degrees, 2 professional degrees and 12 doctoral degrees. The University has been accredited by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools since 1935. There are almost 700 full-time and part-time faculty who provide instruction at the main campus and the additional five site campuses located across the state of Florida. Prior to 2013, there was no centralized faculty development that addressed the needs and interests of faculty at all campuses. The 12 colleges and schools were tasked with leading and creating their own faculty development efforts, but these efforts were often stalled because of funding limitations, and, in some instances, shifts in administration. Aside from ongoing administrative transitions and funding challenges, the University reckoned with the dilemma of determining faculty development needs; ways these needs differed for faculty of various disciplines, ranks and teaching caliber; and, finally, what resources might be required to satisfy these needs.

Every Great Solution Begins With an Even Greater Problem

In fact, the University has experienced a great deal of turnover. Since 2011, there have been three presidents (both interim and permanent), three provosts, and as many as eight transitions among deans within the 12 colleges and schools. Each of these transitions has introduced new priorities. Meanwhile, the inconsistent efforts of faculty development were often being lost in the shuffle. The most recent administration recognized these inconsistencies, gaps in effort, and ineffective movement toward accomplishing professional development goals that solely addressed the interests and needs of the faculty.

As mandated by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association for Colleges and Schools (SACSCOC), the University is required to design a comprehensive Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that addresses student success with a topic that introduces learning outcomes aligned with the institution’s mission, a broad-based approach for implementation, and an assessment component for the purpose of evaluation after five years. The 2010 QEP committee conducted a campus-wide assessment that revealed less than 50% of faculty were participating in any form of sustained, ongoing faculty development activity; and there was little to no faculty development effort that focused solely on the purpose of significantly enhancing the quality of instruction. After the implementation of the QEP, survey results revealed that more than 64% of the faculty (n=174) attended a faculty development workshop/training; more than 60% of faculty who participated in a workshop/training had revised a course syllabus with the intent of incorporating active learning; and more than 94% found workshop/trainings enhanced their knowledge and awareness of pedagogical best practices for improving critical thinking skills (FAMU QEP, 2015, Faculty Pre-Planning). The campus-wide assessment provided insight into faculty needs and instructional deficiencies. Thus, it was determined that some of the issues identified might be holistically addressed by incorporating them into a broad-based improvement plan.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Envisioning: To picture mentally some future product, process, or event.

Critical Thinking: The ability to understand, apply, analyze, and solve problems; develop new knowledge; and think creatively.

Quality Instruction: The teacher can effectively engage students in the learning process and relay relevant knowledge; the delivery of an instruction in a way that evokes students' interest, critical thinking, and learning in a meaningful way.

Course Redesign: Changing instructional methods and implementing technology in order to make entire courses more effective and improve student results.

Digital Learning: Learning facilitated by technology that gives students some element of control over time, place, path, and/or pace.

Faculty Development Activities: Activities that help faculty members improve their knowledge, skills, teaching effectiveness, and advance the vitality of educational institutions.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: