The extent to which the tacit assumptions, attitudes, conceptualizations, epistemologies, and values of a specific academic discipline (such as chemistry) provide that discipline and its associated community of scholars with both professional identity, personal identification, and internal cohesion, but which also serve to distinguish and separate it from disciplines (such as sociology).
Published in Chapter:
Bricolage: Excursions Into Transdisciplinary Territory
David Starr-Glass (University of New York in Prague, Czech Republic & SUNY Empire State College – Prague, Czech Republic)
Copyright: © 2019
|Pages: 15
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-9531-1.ch016
Abstract
Disciplinary work is conducted within a socially constructed framework of assumptions, processes, methodologies, and discovery that are particular to, and embedded in, a specific discipline. Disciplinary paradigms define the discipline and provide it with a cohesive integrity, but they also operate as barriers for those outside the disciplinary community. For collaborative explorations and research—whether in the form of interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, or transdisciplinary work—it is necessary for those involved to first recognize and appreciate these paradigmatic boundaries before negotiating them. The approach of the bricoleur is different. Bricoleurs make do with fragments of previous knowledge, analogous encounters, and different disciplinary experience and use them to gain new insights into the problem at hand—insights that may be partial but which are also both pragmatic and functional. This chapter considers the nature of bricolage and the approach of bricoleurs in conducting explorations of transdisciplinary territory.