Empowering Students: Decentering the English Monolingual Norm Through Discourse

Empowering Students: Decentering the English Monolingual Norm Through Discourse

Copyright: © 2023 |Pages: 20
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-8296-4.ch012
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter showcases how faculty in the early childhood studies department in one of the most linguistically and culturally diverse states in the United States create discourse spaces to empower students. These spaces invite students to critically explore how the power relations of society affect individuals' language development, learning, and identities. In so doing, the English monolingual norm of educational settings is questioned. The faculty empowers students, many of whom are dual language learners themselves, by providing them with the theoretical and pedagogical foundations to best support our youngest citizens, who are more linguistically and culturally diverse than ever. This chapter provides numerous assignment examples that illustrate how each course creates a pedagogical discourse space to honor the languages and cultures of all students, to decenter the English norm that is prevalent in the education system, and to enable students to create more linguistically and culturally inclusive and equitable classrooms.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Dual Language Learners (DLLs) are one of the fastest-growing populations in the United States. Defined as children ages eight and under with a parent whose home language is other than English, DLLs comprise 32% of all young children in the nation (Park et al., 2017a). In California, the number of DLLs is even more striking, as it makes up 60% of the young children’s population (ages 0-8) in the state. The top five home languages spoken by parents of DLLs in California are Spanish (65.3%), Chinese, which includes Mandarin, Cantonese, and other Chinese languages (4.4%), Tagalog (3.6%), Vietnamese (2.7%), and Korean (1.5%) (Park et al., 2017b).

Despite this linguistic and cultural diversity, most educational programs in the U.S. are still predominantly English monolingual, largely affecting the academic achievements of DLLs, owing to the linguistic gap between home and school. Although California is presently one of the most linguistically diverse states, it once embraced the English-only law (Proposition 227), enacted in 1998 and only ended in 2016 when repealed by Proposition 58 (Shin, 2018). Currently, while several states including California have mandated bilingual education laws, other states such as Tennessee have enacted laws forbidding bilingual education in public schools (Park et al., 2017a). Furthermore, while a wide range of studies have validated the cognitive, social-emotional, and economic benefits of bilingualism for individuals and society (Kroll & Dussias, 2017), the research underlines a lack of adequate professional preparation for early childhood teachers to work with dual language learners (Zepeda, Castro, & Cronin, 2011). AB 1363, which was recently passed in California and began implementation on January 1, 2023, aims to systematize the identification of DLLs in state preschool programs with the goal of informing future policy and program decisions to increase equitable service in early childhood programs (Cal. Legis. Assemb, 2021). As such, it is imperative that teacher preparation programs prepare and equip teacher candidates for an increasingly linguistically and culturally diverse workforce and student population.

The national- and state-level context described above is fundamental in understanding the local context of this work. This chapter is situated in this linguistic, geographical, and political context. The authors are faculty in the Early Childhood Studies (ECS) department at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (referred to hereafter as CPP). In this chapter, the authors present how they have created discourse spaces that strive to combat the English monolingual norm of educational settings. In so doing, they empower their students who pursue a career in working with children who are likely to reflect California’s diverse demographics.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Discourse: A verbal or written exchange of ideas, thoughts, and/or experiences.

Assimilationists: The people who believe that immigrants should be assimilated into host countries by adopting mainstream language and culture.

Funds of Knowledge: The knowledge that is socially acquired from interactions with family members and caregivers, and others. Funds of knowledge include language, culture, tradition, and ways of thinking and doing.

STEAM: Science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics.

Language Ideologies: Beliefs around language use. For example, some people may believe all immigrants should not speak their home languages and use English only whereas others may believe immigrants can maintain their home languages while learning and using English. These beliefs reflect their language ideologies.

Translanguaging: The use of one’s full linguistic repertoire, including first and additional languages and dialects.

Pluralists: The people who believe that immigrants can and should maintain their own cultures and languages in host countries.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset