The change cycle is referred to stages of preparation for implementation that should focus on the change: unfreezing, implementing, and refreezing.
Published in Chapter:
Integrating Cycle of Prochaska and DiClemente With Ethically Responsible Behavior Theory for Social Change Management: Post-COVID-19 Social Cognitive Perspective for Change
Ansar Abbas (Airlangga Universtias, Indonesia), Dian Ekowati (Airlangga Universtias, Indonesia), Fendy Suhariadi (Airlangga Universtias, Indonesia), Rakotoarisoa Maminirina Fenitra (Airlangga Universitas, Indonesia), and Mochammad Fahlevi (Bina Nusantara University, Indonesia)
Copyright: © 2022
|Pages: 26
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8856-7.ch007
Abstract
Humans could never have predicted what would happen as a result of COVID-19. Indeed, such foresight was not expected. It can also be stated that planning to combat COVID-19 was beyond human capacity. However, the future may be foretold by seeing many aspects that we have experienced. Current values, styles of working, social systems, organizational transformations, and human behavior have all been altered due to the epidemic. Those changes will sustain the anticipated direction. This chapter goes into change cycle theory and how COVID-19 affected current social norms. Initially, the idea was integrated with social norms, but social cognition impacts were analogized as they progressed. It is interwoven with the goal that ethically social responsibility developments will assist in the design of a post-COVID-19 society approach. It is expected that we would be able to strategically carry some of the benefits of social awareness gained during COVID-19 for a brighter future in the post-COVID-19 age.